Featured Article

The Gods of Liberalism Revisited

 

The lie hasn't changed, and we still fall for it as easily as ever.  But how can we escape the snare?

 

READ ABOUT IT...

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Evolution Doesn't Conform to Scientific Laws


From a great article about how the simple cell blows a hole a mile wide in the theory of evolution, from Babu Ranganathan on The Conservative Voice:

Without DNA there cannot be RNA, and without RNA there cannot be DNA. And without either DNA or RNA there cannot be proteins, and without proteins there cannot be DNA or RNA. They're all mutually dependent upon each other for existence! The cell is irreducibly complex. It could not have gradually evolved! Evolutionists generally believe that it took one billion years for the first life form or cell to have evolved. That belief, although still taught as gospel in many elementary and secondary schools, cannot be sustained by modern science.

The great British scientist Sir Frederick Hoyle has said that the probability of the sequence of molecules in the simplest cell coming into existence by chance is equivalent to a tornado going through a junk yard of airplane parts and assembling a 747 Jumbo Jet!

For evolution to have occurred and resulted in the organisms we see today, it would have had to violate the laws of nature.

It takes a lot more faith to believe in evolution than in the Bible.


2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Starts with a strawman argument. Claims to be science, but is written by a religion man and posted on a conservative website that adores Ann Coulter. Quotes a scientist from 25 years ago.

Classic propaganda, but no science in it. It is all about faith and nothing about reality.

Bob Ellis said...

Anonymous continued: "Meanwhile, excuse me while I completely ignore everything you said and keep my head buried in the sand of evolutionary dogma where it's nice and comfortable."

Dakota Voice
 
Clicky Web Analytics