By Carrie K. Hutchens
I couldn't believe it when Wolfe Blitzer referred to the New Hampshire primary as a stunning win for Hillary Clinton. Stunning win? This allegedly invincible, unbeatable candidate only won the primary by 2%. That's hardly impressive within the scheme of things, even if one wants to believe that she was losing by large numbers 48 hours before the primary itself. Obviously, the polls were wrong, so why use them to define her win? (Full Article)
Featured Article
The Gods of Liberalism Revisited
The lie hasn't changed, and we still fall for it as easily as ever. But how can we escape the snare?
|
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Hillary Clinton's Stunningly Unstunning Win
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment