The insane freedom hating liberals with gun allergies need to understand that
guns are vital for their Liberty. It is very wrong to kick kids out of school
for drawing pictures of guns if they pose no threat to anyone.
Guns are wonderful for order keeping, Freedom fighting; and food providing and every child needs to understand how they work and how to use them safely.
Gun training along with aggressive Christ-centered, "Sanctity of Life" curriculum will result in more safety in society and more respect for God and each other. This will result in less violence and selfishness.
I also propose a National Gun Design and Drawing Contest for children of all ages.
Long live the 2nd ammendment and the Manly desire to defend home and country.
Take a child shooting or hunting this week.
God Bless America;
freedompoet
Wednesday, August 29, 2007
Mandatory Gun Training and Drawing Contests
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
The Founders shed light on the true intent behind the Second Amendment. As proper as it is to have the right to hunt, and even more importantly to defend yourself from imminent threats from those with ill intent, more than anything else the Second Amendment exists to keep the people free.
From the Pennsylvania Gazette, February 20, 1788, Tench Coxe said "Who are the militia? are they not ourselves. Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American...The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people ."
James Madison said in the Federalist Papers, Federalist No. 46: "Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments,to which the people are attached, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. And it is not certain, that with this aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes. But were the people to possess the additional advantages of local governments chosen by themselves, who could collect the national will and direct the national force, and of officers appointed out of the militia, by these governments, and attached both to them and to the militia, it may be affirmed with the greatest assurance, that the throne of every tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned in spite of the legions which surround it."
And in Federalist No. 28, Alexander Hamilton said, "If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual State. In a single State, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair."
Of course, liberals--usually the main opponent of the right to keep and bear arms--are so in love with government and government exercise of power that the thought of the people resisting an oppressive government is practically unthinkable to them. Yet that is exactly what the founders of the United States did.
The men who in colonial times founded the United States had no choice but to take up arms when faced with the oppressive government of England. That government had become over-regulated, was imposing high and unfair taxes on the people, was disrespectful of individual property rights, and had become unresponsive to the appeals of reason.
That is a condition not unlike the one average, God-fearing Americans find themselves in today...from their own United States government.
(Quotes above found at GunCite.com)
Post a Comment