Nothing's ever a surprise from the Left, but here's an article on how the Leftists are undermining our borders and our national security by promoting illegal immigration.
From the Washington Times:
Wealthy philanthropic foundations are helping bankroll the pro-immigration movement, while groups advocating for tighter control of U.S. borders say they take a more grassroots approach to raising money.
The Ford Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation and Democratic activist George Soros, among other liberal funders, have donated millions of dollars to pro-immigration groups, as the Senate continues its debate on a contentious bill that would overhaul the nation's immigration policy.
4 comments:
Unfortunately, it is not just liberals who seem to believe we must have a porous undefended border, but also the coporate business wing of the GOP (the Bush side) that wants cheap union-busting labor.
All we hear from those groups is blather about freedom and opportunity and the wonders of diversity and more political correctness than any normal human can stand.
And if liberal or conservatives note that we don't have a country if we can't control our borders and expel illegal invaders, the diversity freaks and the cheap labor proponents start their kill the messenger routine with labels like "mouth breathers, Xenophobes, Nativists, bigots, racists, nazi-like, etc".
It clearly indicates the poverty in both the left and right freaks for porous borders and mindless diversity.
Conservatives don't support a porous border; that's liberals in both the Democrat and Republican parties.
Bob,
Is the Catholic church "liberal"?
It has long supported a porous border without penalties for illegal aliens and has churches claiming to provide immunity for illegal aliens.
South Dakota has Catholic churches using Spanish.
What do you think about that?
Big business is funding the attacks on limitations of immigration for work.
Douglas: There are liberals within the Catholic church, along with elements of liberal philosophy held by some people, just as there are in every area of Christianity.
And I don't like the use of Spanish institutionally within the United States. Interpreters may occasionally be needed for emergency services, but the obligation should be upon the visitor or naturalized citizen to learn the dominant language of our nation.
And I understand there are elements within business that enjoy the fruits of cheap labor; I have a friend who owns a construction company, and he's told me of the struggles he faces staying competitive while other contractors reduce their bottom line by hiring illegals.
The bad attitude cuts across many or even most spectra of society; otherwise, the problem wouldn't be so widespread and uncontrolled. Lawlessness and undermining sovereignty shouldn't be condoned by anyone.
Post a Comment