A couple of the far-Left South Dakota blogs have been posting allegations the past few days that a polling company hired by the VoteYesForLife.com folks has ties to pornography.
I'm not into throwing up a smokescreen when there's a potential problem, even on my side of the political aisle, so I checked it out.
While I don't have all the time on my hands that these people apparently do, I was still unable to substantiate their claims--even with their own Google query strings (I think they may be using some liberal search engine called "Gaggle" or something).
Maybe I didn't dig deep enough, but I would think that my law enforcement and investigative experience, not to mention several years experience in internet technologies, would have made me capable of verifying these bold claims without going to "Oliver Stone" lengths.
I also checked with the VoteYesForLife.com folks yesterday; after all, it's hard to know everything about a company whose services you hire, so I wondered if maybe that was at the heart of the matter.
However, VoteYesForLife.com confirmed that they company they're using to poll South Dakota voters about support for the abortion ban isn't even any of the ones alleged by these fringe Leftists. And they also don't have any ties to pornography, as alleged.
C'mon folks. We can disagree about whether abortion kills a human being without stooping to unsubstantiated rumor-mongering. If you feel the need to try and smear the pro-life effort again, at least try to have some grain of truth in your allegation next time. This kind of gutter activity just makes you look worse than you already do in advocating the butchery of children.
Featured Article
The Gods of Liberalism Revisited
The lie hasn't changed, and we still fall for it as easily as ever. But how can we escape the snare?
|
Wednesday, August 23, 2006
Unsubstantiated Lies from the Pro-Abortion Left
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment