Rape Exception, Evidence Optional

From a Sioux City Journal article dated 8/20:

But the ban's critics say such emergency contraception isn't widely available in South Dakota. They also say many rape and incest survivors don't report the crime at all -- let alone within the short time during which the drugs are effective. The U.S. Justice Department estimates less than 40 percent of rapes and sexual assaults are actually reported.

So we're supposed to allow women to kill their children just because they say they need to, with no evidence of a rape?

So we're saying it's vital that women have the right to have their unborn children ripped apart in their womb or chemically burned in their womb--and this is something they would seek out, yet wouldn't go to the police or hospital after being raped?

So we want to just flush away with emergency contraception the evidence of a brutal crime of rape or incest against a woman?

I guess that makes sense if you're desperate to keep the right to kill your unborn child.