NewsMax has a story about a report released by a couple of German scientists who examined the theory of global warming and found it to be incompatible with physics.
They've also proven that there can be no way of accurately measuring average global temperature in the way it is now done. CO2 cannot play the role attributed to it by the supporters of the global warming theory, and the very idea violates the laws of thermodynamics.
It also points out that Al Gore's chief apostles and their theorectical models don't intersect with reality.
The report quotes physicist Freeman J. Dyson about relying on computer modeling to predict climate change: "'The models ... do a very good job of describing the fluid motions of the atmosphere and the oceans. They do a very poor job of describing the clouds, the dust, the chemistry and the biology of fields and farms and forests. They do not begin to describe the real world that we live in ... It is much easier for a scientist to sit in an air-conditioned building and run computer models, than to put on winter clothes and measure what is really happening outside in the swamps and the clouds.'
The report is 114 pages long and is very technical in many places, but read it for yourself and see if there isn't more science in this report than in Al Gore's science fiction stories.
2 comments:
The source cited is plain batch of koosky right of center dingbats who have terrible record ofsimply using name calling to make a point. Gore, like him or not, has 90+ of world climatologists on his side. It is not simply Gore but science that is making the claim.
Really? Is the Technical University Carolo-Wilhelmina in Germany a "koosky right of center dingbat" university?
And what if Gore and his disciples are a "batch of koosky left of center dingbats"? Have you ever considered that possibility?
I don't think 90+% of climatologists are on board with Al Gore's global warming fantasy, but even if they were, since when does a majority constitute truth? Did it when the majority of people believed the sun orbited the earth? Did the majority constitute truth when it believed the earth was flat? Did the majority constitute truth when it went along with Hitler?
It isn't science that's making these claims of anthropogenic global warming; it is the theory and interpretation of some scientists who want it to be true.
Try considering some of the evidence to the contrary, and the thousands of scientists who DON'T buy into Al Gore's fairie tale, then evaluate where the truth might lay.
Post a Comment