WorldNetDaily is reporting on part of a declassified report from the National Ground Intelligence Center, a Defense Department intelligence unit.
We've been finding WMDs and evidence of them since before the war was over (remember the chemicals found in the Euphrates River?). But if the Left refuses to see it, then it doesn't exist.
I'm reminded of the monkeys hearing and seeing no evil (the Left says plenty of it, though).
Featured Article
The Gods of Liberalism Revisited
The lie hasn't changed, and we still fall for it as easily as ever. But how can we escape the snare?
|
Thursday, June 22, 2006
Hundreds of WMDs discovered in Iraq
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Yeah right! How do we know WMDs were found? All we have us the word of the current administration and being they have been lying since day one, why should we start believing them now?
Ellis, at least try to not sound like an idiot. Shells the Iraqi Army buried and didn’t know it had and were inactive? Shells that the CIA, White House and military says wasn’t part of the alleged Iraqi WMD program? Sounds pretty scary. From the Washington Post:
Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.), chairman of the House intelligence committee, and Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) told reporters yesterday that weapons of mass destruction had in fact been found in Iraq, despite acknowledgments by the White House and the insistence of the intelligence community that no such weapons had been discovered.
“We have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons,” Santorum said.
The lawmakers pointed to an unclassified summary from a report by the National Ground Intelligence Center regarding 500 chemical munitions shells that had been buried near the Iranian border, and then long forgotten, by Iraqi troops during their eight-year war with Iran, which ended in 1988.
The U.S. military announced in 2004 in Iraq that several crates of the old shells had been uncovered and that they contained a blister agent that was no longer active. Neither the military nor the White House nor the CIA considered the shells to be evidence of what was alleged by the Bush administration to be a current Iraqi program to make chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.
Last night, intelligence officials reaffirmed that the shells were old and were not the suspected weapons of mass destruction sought in Iraq after the 2003 invasion.
Yeah, Bob, looks like the crazy left has taken over the CIA and the White House, since they've both been saying since 2004 that there were no WMD's.
What will we think of next?
Ooooooooooh, my goodness, reality hurts!
Joanie: Oh, I'm sorry. I forgot that the Bush administration were such liars. Pity they couldn't learn from the pristine Clinton administration that never lied about anything, including a stained dress or Clinton's huge push for welfare reform that Republicans fought him on every step of the way, and all the other lies that never came out of his mouth every time he opened it, even though one of his fellow Democrats called him "an unusally good liar."
I suppose if anyone connected to the Bush administration said the sky was blue, you'd run out and check it. You guys on the Left are so deluded, you're pathetic. ANYTHING to keep from facing the fact that you're WRONG (about pretty much everything you say).
I'm reminded of ole Gollum on Lord of the Rings, when he put his hands over his ears and said, "Not list'nin. Not list'nin." That's you guys on the Left. Has been for a long time. When it comes to reality, you're response is: "Not list'nin. Not list'nin."
Anon 9:30: If YOU had read the report, you'd find that many of these WMDs are still usable. If you think they're no longer dangerous, maybe we can ship the contents to your house and you can confirm that for the rest of us. How 'bout that?
Libs have been crying "No WMDs! No WMDs!" for four years now, yet we've been finding them for four years.
Obviously we haven't been finding them in the numbers we (and the rest of the world, including congressional Democrats and the Clinton administration) expected, but I guess it's beyond a liberal's intellectual capacity to draw the conclusion that maybe, just maybe, many of them were moved to Syria or, like the case of the chemicals in the Euphrates River, destroyed before we had control of the country.
But for the Left, no matter what you show them, it's "Not list'nin! Not list'nin!"
Even the Bush administration says you're wrong.
Post a Comment