Homosexual Action Fund Energized to Push Homosexuality at State Level

In the 2006 effort to pass Amendment C, South Dakota's constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman, 29% of the funding to oppose the defense of marriage came from the Gill Action Fund.

The Gill Action Fund is an advocacy group started by wealthy Coloradan Tim Gill to promote the legitimization of homosexuality around the country.

This year a pro-homosexual South Dakota group called Equality South Dakota for the first time endorsed and contributed campaign funds to pro-homosexual legislative candidates in the June South Dakota primary. While the few Republicans they endorsed were mostly a flop (1 of 4 were elected in the primary), they did better on the Democrat side (6 of 7).

Equality South Dakota has also announced a list of legislative candidates they will be supporting in the general election this year. Those include some Rapid City area candidates such as Democrat Eric Abrahamson, House Dist. 32, Democrat Bethany Wojahn, House Dist. 32, Democrat Dennis Finch, Senate Dist. 33, Democrat Jeff Nelson, House Dist. 33, Republican Craig Tieszen, Senate Dist. 34, Democrat Fern Johnson, House Dist. 35, and Democrat Curtis Marquardt, House Dist. 35.

It is unclear at this time whether there is a connection between Equality South Dakota and the Gill Action Fund.

But the Catholic News Agency is reporting on a speech by Tim Gill at the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered (LGBT) Delegates Caucus at the Democratic National Convention on Monday.

According to the report, the strategy to force legitimization of homosexual behavior on the American people is one that begins at the state level.

“Every single advance for gay rights has come at the state level,” Gill said, saying the most important thing the Democratic LGBT delegates could do is “go back and support those pro-gay state legislators, and eliminate the anti-gay state legislators.”

He encouraged the delegates to donate to state candidates out of state, especially in rural areas.

The billionaire homosexual activist also counseled the audience not to donate to unwinnable races, but rather to focus their donations where they will most likely change the outcome of elections.

“Just a little bit of money goes a long way,” he said.

If all the LGBT delegates donated fifty dollars to specially targeted races, which he numbered at no more than ten or twenty per election year, Gill said “we can get rid of them.”

Gill makes it pretty clear what you're voting for when you support one party or another:

By successfully changing Republican legislatures to Democratic ones, Gill claimed, “the net result is always good for gays.”

The campaign to force the legitimization of homosexuality on society, and subsequently undermine marriage and family, is well organized and well funded.

Meanwhile, it is unclear whether grassroots pro-family supporters are sufficiently alerted and energized to the threat.

So far, most states have Defense of Marriage Acts (DOMA) if not constitutional amendments protecting marriage. However, as the recent judicial activism in California illustrates, a DOMA will not protect the sanctity of marriage from radical judges bent on forcing their will on the people.

Constitutional amendments are the only hope the states have to protect the most foundational institution of our civilization. And we also need a Federal Marriage Amendment to protect this social engineering from being forced on the states from a federal level.

Those who would turn our civilization upside down and into sexual and social anarchy are not passive and they are not slowing down.

Pro-family supporters would do well to learn from them and energize to protect the current and future generation from the dissolution of all we hold dear.